Kendall Coffey Quotes

TwitterRss

Publicity vs. the Plea

Dominique Strauss-Kahn: Publicity and a Plea Deal By Kendall Coffey, The New York Times May 26, 2011 As the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn reminds us, pretrial publicity is never a defendant’s friend and is usually a crushing adversary. There is no presumption of innocence in America’s court of public opinion where accusations are embraced, denials are dismissed and few open minds await the day in court promised by our Constitution. The impact on future jurors has been documented by empirical studies confirming the common sense notion that negative publicity contributes to negative results. Even though trial judges try hard to minimize that damage, as one Supreme Court quoted a candid juror, “You can’t forget what you see and hear.” Even before trial, critical rulings are decided by judges, many elected, who are fair enough to try to ignore the condemnation outside the courthouse but human enough to carefully follow media reports. At times, the result can seem to be rulings that are less susceptible to criticism and more hospitable to the prosecution. And yet, the vast majority of criminal cases are not decided by either judges or jurors, Since more than 90 percent of criminal cases are resolved by plea bargains, it is the prosecution office, mostly headed by elected D.A.s, who are the real decision-makers. And with the public watching closely and even vengefully at times, agreeing to a “lenient” deal is about as popular for prosecutors as supporting a tax hike is for a legislator. Irrespective of the merits of the case, the likelihood remains that at some point the top-tier defense team will discuss a possible plea with prosecutors. And if they do, public opinion, contaminated by perp walking and salacious reports that no judge would allow as evidence, will be an uninvited guest to that negotiation. The fact is that whatever happened on that Saturday afternoon, this defendant has already lost in one venue and it may be the one that matters the...

Read More

Comments on the Death Penalty

Interview with Kendall Coffey CNN – October 31, 2007 Kendall Coffey: The issue before the U.S. Supreme Court right now is lethal injection. But many are properly seeing it as part of a broader attack on the death penalty.  And the United States and the American Bar Association, on separate grounds entirely, came out yesterday asking for a moratorium throughout the country on the death penalty so that the basic fairness within which death penalty defendants are tried and judged is more carefully examined…. A horrifically botched execution. It’s occurred elsewhere.  We have a love-hate relationship with the death-penalty. We see these despicable crimes; we want the maximum punishment applied to people who brutally kill children or to terrorists. At the same time we’re very concerned about mistakes being made; both mistakes with respect to selecting who is worthy of dying, if anyone, and mistakes with respect to the actual administration of execution and these kind of cases where horrible pains and horrible mistreatment occurs in the course of an execution, are very troubling to Americans and obviously of great concern to the United States Supreme Court… Right now I think the rest of the country is basically standing back and saying, “The U.S. Supreme Court wants to hear this case in January in terms of looking at whether or not the way legal injection is administered constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. So I think every state is going to hold back on capital punishment, at least with respect to lethal injection until the Supreme Court decides what to do.  Theoretically, states could adopt other forms of execution.  I don’t think that’s going to happen. I think death penalty opponents, death penalty advocates, are going to be holding their breathe until the Supreme Court rules…. Well, that’s certainly part of the controversy, with respect to these last minute appeals of death row inmates, is waiting to the last minute. But the court has a much broader issue to look at. … And I think in January…They’re not going to focus on whether this particular death-row inmate was last minute or not.  They’ve already indicated based on rulings they’ve made with respect to holding off other executions of other inmates; that this case has broad implications for death-row inmates across the country and I think what they want to know is whether the lethal injection process is being administered in a way that is unnecessarily cruel.  There is pain when someone is put to death; but the question is whether there could be improvements in the training of people who do it.   Remember doctors are not ethically allowed to be involved in putting people to death in this country through executions; so there are real questions about prison officials who are administering it.  And at the same time, are the actual chemical ingredients something that need to be recalibrated to make sure there is a more humane way of accomplishing something that is inherently inhumane?…… Well, that is an odd but...

Read More